Volgens deze Israëlische krant is 'genocide toegestaan'

Politiek
zaterdag, 02 augustus 2014 om 8:55
welingelichtekringen header 1
De Times of Israel had enige tijd een column op zijn site staan waarin de auteur - een Amerikaanse jood - uit de doeken deed dat een regering soms mag, nee moet overgaan tot genocide. Omdat dat de enige manier is om de eigen bevolking te beschermen. De column werd na een tijdje off line gehaald. Gawker had hem voor die tijd vastgelegd en om te laten zien hoe de wereld er in de hersens van sommige vrienden van Israël uitzien hier de voornaamste passages" …it's now obvious that the US and the UN are completely out of touch with the nature of this foe and are therefore not qualified to dictate or enforce the rules of this war—because when it comes to terror there is much more than meets the eye.
I wasn't aware of this, but it seems that the nature of warfare has undergone a major shift over the years. Where wars were usually waged to defeat the opposing side, today it seems — and judging by the number of foul calls it would indicate — that today's wars are fought to a draw. I mean, whoever heard of a timeout in war? An NBA Basketball game allows six timeouts for each team during the course of a game, but last I checked this is a war! We are at war with an enemy whose charter calls for the annihilation of our people. Nothing, then, can be considered disproportionate when we are fighting for our very right to live…
News anchors such as those from CNN, BBC and Al-Jazeera have not missed an opportunity to point out the majority of innocent civilians who have lost their lives as a result of this war. But anyone who lives with rocket launchers installed or terror tunnels burrowed in or around the vicinity of their home cannot be considered an innocent civilian...
I will conclude with a question for all the humanitarians out there. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu clearly stated at the outset of this incursion that his objective is to restore a sustainable quiet for the citizens of Israel. We have already established that it is the responsibility of every government to ensure the safety and security of its people. If political leaders and military experts determine that the only way to achieve its goal of sustaining quiet is through genocide is it then permissible to achieve those responsible goals?
Bron(nen): Gawker